翻訳と辞書 |
Argersinger v. Hamlin : ウィキペディア英語版 | Argersinger v. Hamlin
''Argersinger v. Hamlin'', , is a United States Supreme Court decision holding that the accused cannot be subjected to actual imprisonment unless provided with counsel. ''Gideon v. Wainwright'' made the right to counsel provided in the Sixth Amendment applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. ==Background== Jon Richard Argersinger was sentenced under Florida law to 90 days in jail for carrying a concealed weapon, but was never represented by counsel. Hamlin was the local sheriff. Argersinger claimed his conviction was unconstitutional, but his case was dismissed by the Florida Supreme Court, who relied on ''Duncan v. Louisiana'', which held that jury trials were not required for crimes with a sentence of less than six months. The Florida court claimed that since jury trials were not required for misdemeanors, then neither was counsel.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Argersinger v. Hamlin」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|